Were the Shang people of China black-skinned or did they have mongoloid feskin analyzer cameraatures?

Home » Blog

The Shang Dynasty people of China from about 1100BC to 1700BC. How do the people writing these articles know how the Ancient Chinese looked like? Also, look at the fourth picture on this link. I think the face on it looks like it has Black/ African features on…
show more
The Shang Dynasty people of China from about 1100BC to 1700BC. How do the people writing these articles know how the Ancient Chinese looked like? Also, look at the fourth picture on this link. I think the face on it looks like it has Black/ African features on it.
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/a…

These links also has information about the early Shang people and even the Xia people.
http://lostfeather.weebly.com/black-chin…
http://clyde.winters.tripod.com/junezine…
http://www.raceandhistory.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl/noframes/read/948

I think this is called the Black Shang Theory or something.

Also, if the Shang people of China (and earlier cultures/ dynasties) were black, were they purely black, genetically, or did they mix with the indigenous Chinese (who had already arrived from Africa 65,000 years ago)? Because if they were purely black, it doesn’t seem likely that their appearance would change so quickly within 6,000 years. Also, there are some pottery designs and objects that resemble mongoloid features too.
Like this picture:
http://commons.wiskin analyzer machine companieskimedia.org/wiki/File:CMOC_Treasures_of_Ancient_China_exhibit_-_bronze_battle_axe.jpg but i’m not really sure.

Answer:
Maikang In addition to the good answers from HuCipher and Kevin7 …

Others have asked questions before about the realhistoryww.com site.

That site is not reliable. It’s mostly nonsense and fantasy.

It’s understandable, in the face of the vast amount of racist “White Race” and “Aryan” mythology and pseudo-science, that some people are tempted to counteract with an exaggerated “Black” version of human history. But – incorrect is still incorrect.

Africa has a distinguished role as the birthplace and original home of all mankind; and the populations of Africa have an honourable place in human history and development. There’s no need to make stuff up, to give Africans their rightful place. If we cut away the confusion and racist illusions to see the real patterns in human history, Africa stands on its own feet.skin analyzer

Maikang Indians are the 1st Caucasians to ever survive this earth. The White epidermis is somewhat a genetic mutation that got here approximately while a set of Afghans and northern Indians flocked to Europe. remember, there continues to be variety interior of White skinned people too. Even our White epidermis isn’t each and all the comparable and distinctive Whites are greater for categories of chilly dark climates. a number of them lived in forests with extra sunlight than the marshes the place the fog blocked it out and the far North is in undemanding terms a very distinctive environment all at the same time. some have distinctive pigmentation for the plains or the steppes too with the aid of fact there is doubtlessly extra sunlight with the aid of loss of forests.skin analyzer

Maikang Why is it so difficult to accept that African Black people ruled China and the Chinese once upon a time? Just like the Native Americans did before the Europeans came to the Americas.skin analyzer

Maikang Black Shang Dynastyskin analyzer

Maikang They were not Africoid.They may have had Australoid ( Tamil Indians .Australian Aboriginal,other groups) and Mongoloid ancestry or a different ancestry or partly different ancestry We can not be totally sure how they looked,since it was so long agoskin analyzer

Maikang I don’t think there were any black skinned races in china during that period.If there were probably they were dravidians from indian sub-continent who migrated to these regions and intermixed with nativesskin analyzer

CATEGORY AND TAGS: